Send by mail
Done
The link to this page has been sent to the addressee.
Check your email.
Sapronova
An effective corporate governance system is a major driver of UTLC ERA’s sustainable development.
We have an advanced corporate governance system based on the Russian statutory requirements and the best corporate practices.
Number of General Meetings of Shareholders / Meetings of the Board of Directors and its Committees, the Management Board in 2022
(8 meetings by video conference, 1 meeting with joint attendance),
4 meetings in the form of absentee voting.
5 meetings in the form of absentee voting
5 meetings in the form of absentee voting
2 meetings in the form of absentee voting
2 meetings in the form of absentee voting
Committee under the Board of Directors
2 meetings in the form of absentee voting
2 meetings in the form of absentee voting
1 meeting in the form of absentee voting
1 meeting in the form of absentee voting
Dividend Policy
the resolution on dividend
announcement and payment
Main Resolutions Adopted in 2022
on April 7, 2022
on May 13, 2022
on June 15, 2022
Board of Directors
Corporate Secretary
Committee Secretary
Dmitri
Bulgakov
Deputy Director of Legal Corporate Service Department
Year of birth
1992
Nationality
Russian Federation
Career
2023 until present
Deputy Director of Corporate Service Legal Department, UTLC ERA
2019 — 2022
Head of Corporate Service Department, UTLC ERA
2016 — 2019
Head of Corporate Department, JSC GU ZKH
Education
Saratov State Academy of Law (SSAL), major in Legal Studies
Kutafin Moscow State Law University, major in Corporate Law
Management Board and General Director
Alexey
Grom
General Director, Chairman of the Management Board
Year of birth
1971
Nationality
Russian Federation
Career
2019 until present
General Director of UTLC ERA, Chairman of the Management Board
2018–2019
President of UTLC ERA, Chairman of the Management Board
2016–2020
President of JSC UTLC, Chairman of the Management Board
2014–2015
First Deputy General Director of LLC “PО UTLC”
2012–2014
First Vice President of FESCO
Education
Moscow Institute of Transport Engineering, major in Transportation Process Management
Stockholm School of Economics, Master of Business Administration (MBA)
Remuneration system
Marina
Ivanova
HR Management Department Director
General Director
In order to motivate the General Director to improve the management efficiency and to solve the strategic tasks set by the shareholders and the Board of Directors, the company has the effective Regulations on General Director Rewards.
The document provides for the following rewards:
-
Quarter-end bonus
-
Year-end bonus
-
Outstanding performance bonus.
The resolution on rewarding the General Director for the reporting period is adopted by the Board of Directors upon reviewing the General Director’s budget performance report for the corresponding period. The General Director’s performance assessment results are also taken into account. Performance means meeting the qualitative, quantitative and key performance indicators (KPI).
The KPI list, weight and targets for the General Director of UTLC ERA are focused on the company’s operating model, which is based on all transit traffic operations in direct rail or mixed rail and sea service through the territories of at least two shareholders via the border or port stations, including, but not limited to: Dostyk, Altynkol, Brest, Brugi, Svisloch, Mamonovo, Zheleznodorozhny, Kaliningrad-Sortirovochny (Kaliningrad Trade Sea Port), Baltiysk (Baltyisk Port), Buslovskaya and Wartsila, (Finland).
The integral assessment of the general director’s performance by the Board of Directors is performed in the following areas:
-
Corporate discipline
-
High quality and timely budget development for the current and future reporting periods
-
Procurement planning and implementation
-
Contract management and execution
-
Interaction with the Board of Directors
The list of areas is subject to change by the Board of Directors. Performance in each area is assessed according to a four-point grading scale (excellent — 3 points; good — 2; satisfactory — 1; unsatisfactory — 0), with an average grade percentage subsequently calculated for all areas.
Outstanding performance is rewarded as resolved by the Board of Directors on the basis of the General Director’s proposal with the attached performance calculations and supporting indicators. Outstanding performance may be rewarded throughout the reporting period as resolved by the Board of Directors, but no more frequently than once in a quarter.
The General Director’s KPIs are approved by the Board of Directors on an annual basis. The following KPIs were approved for 2022 (Minutes No. 46):
-
Meeting the net profit indicator (weight: 30%)
-
Meeting the return on sales indicator (weight: 20%)
-
Meeting the transit container traffic volume indicator, which is defined as the ratio of actual transit container traffic volume in the reporting period to the volume according to the budget, and calculated in percent (weight: 40%)
-
Integral assessment of the director’s performance by the members of the Company’s Board of Directors with a 10% weight
For the first three KPIs, a target performance range is defined, with a 0, 0.5 or 1 coefficient to be applied within this range.
Members of the Management Board
To provide material incentives to the members of the Management Board for achieving the top corporate performance, improve the work quality and encourage the professional and creative activity, the Company has the effective Regulations on Rewards for Members of the Management Board.
It provides for the following rewards:
-
Quarter-end bonus
-
Year-end bonus
-
Outstanding performance bonus
Rewarding the members of the Management Board at the end of the reporting period is the employer’s right, not a guaranteed benefit. It depends on the qualitative and quantitative key performance indicators of the employees, the company’s financial standing and other factors that may affect the reward availability and amount.
The resolution on rewarding the members of the Management Board is adopted by a majority vote of the Board of Directors upon reviewing the General Director’s budget performance report for the reporting period.
2022 key performance indicators for the members of the Management Board were defined by the Board of Directors of UTLC ERA on December 27, 2021 (Minutes No. 46) and distributed among the members of the Management Board in accordance with their functions and remit.
Key Performance Indicators for Members of the Management Board of UTLC ERA in 2022
№KPI | Indicator | Type of indicator | Calculation formula | Distribution and weight share (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Fulfillment of General Director’s assignments | Quantitative | Not required |
First Deputy General Director -10% Deputy General Director - Commercial Director - 10% Deputy General Director - Transportation Director -10% Deputy General Director (Interaction with SA BZD) - 10% Deputy General Director (Legal) - 10% |
2 | Attainment of Net Income indicator | Financial and economic | X = Net Income (Actual) /Net Income (Plan) * 100% |
First Deputy General Director - 30 Deputy General Director - Commercial Director - 30% Deputy General Director - Transportation Director - 30% Deputy General Director (Interaction with SA BZD) - 30% |
3 | Keeping within the contractual accounts receivable | Financial and economic | X = Accounts receivable (Actual) / Accounts receivable (Established limit) * 100% |
Deputy General Director - Commercial Director - 20% Deputy General Director (Interaction with SA BZD) - 20% |
4 | Attainment of UTLC ERA Transit Container Traffic indicator | Qualitative | X = Transit traffic (Actual) / Transit traffic (Plan)’100% |
First Deputy General Director - 40% Deputy General Director - Commercial Director - 40% Deputy General Director - Transportation Director - 40% Deputy General Director (Interaction with SA BZD) - 40% Deputy General Director (Legal) - 40% |
5 | Minimization of empty car supply costs | Financial and economic | X = Empty car supply expenses as part of transportation cost per 1 TEU (Actual) / Empty car supply expenses as part of transportation cost per 1 TEU (Plan) * 100% |
First Deputy General Director -20% Deputy General Director - Transportation Director -20% |
6 | Creation and maintenance of the Company’s contract management system (development of regulatory documents and standard contracts) | Quantitative | Defined in accordance with the Company General Director’s assessment based on summarized information about repeated violations received from supervisory authorities, external and internal auditors, contracting parties, and heads of the Company’s business units |
Deputy General Director (Legal) - 25% |
7 | No violations of law confirmed by court decisions, or enacted official orders, on matters within the remit of Deputy General Director (Legal) | Quantitative | Not required |
Deputy General Director (Legal) - 25% |
Control System
Irina
Pavlushkova
Chief Accountant — Department Director
Our company targets higher reliability and efficiency standards of our control systems: risk management, compliance and data security.
UTLC ERA’s control system is formalized and based on the generally accepted international standards, covering the business processes and all company’s management levels.
The system operation is supervised by the Board of Directors, including supervision through the Audit Committee.
Audit Commission
The Audit Commission of UTLC ERA is a permanent elected body. The Audit Commission acts on the basis of the Articles of Association of UTLC ERA and the Regulations on the Audit Commission approved by the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders on July 22, 2021. The Audit Commission monitors generation of reliable financial and accounting statements and other information about the UTLC ERA’s financial and business operations and financial situation, as well as asset management improvements, mitigation of financial and operational risks and internal control system improvements.
The Audit Commission of UTLC ERA is elected by the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders for one year until the next Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, and is composed of three members:
-
One representative of JSCo "RZD"
-
One representative of JSC “NC “KTZ”
-
One representative of the Belarusian Railway
Competencies of the Audit Commission
-
Confirms reliability of the information contained in the annual report and the annual accounting (financial) statements
-
Reviews the financial situation of UTLC ERA
-
Arranges and carries out inspection (audit) of UTLC ERA’s financial and business operations
-
Monitors safety and use of fixed assets and expenditure of UTLC ERA’s funds in accordance with the budget
-
Monitors generation and use of UTLC ERA’s reserve fund and other special funds
-
Follows up on earlier directives issued to eliminate violations and shortcomings revealed by previous inspections (audits)
-
Takes other actions (measures) related to the audit of UTLC ERA’s financial and business operations
Auditor
Our company engages an independent external auditor to carry out the annual audit of our financial statements in accordance with the Russian Accounting Standards (RAS) and the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The auditor is approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders and nominated by the Board of Directors.
The auditor of UTLC ERA is CATR – Auditing Services LLC (TIN 7709383532).
On April 6, 2022, the Board of Directors approved the procedure for selecting the auditor of UTLC ERA in 2022 and established the initial (maximum) price of the contract to audit the company’s 2022 accounting (financial) statements in the amount of 8,267,010.00 rubles, excluding 20% VAT (Minutes No. 50 dated 06.04.2022).
Our company held a closed tender to select an auditor who is sufficiently qualified to provide auditor services according to RAS and IFRS to cover the needs of UTLC ERA in 2022. Based on the tender, CATR – Auditing Services LLC was nominated to the Board of Directors and approved on June 24, 2022 (Minutes No. 53 dated 24.06.2022).
The remuneration of UTLC ERA’s auditor is seven million (7,000,000.00) rubles, excluding 20% VAT.
Risk Management
Anna
Belyakova
Deputy Commercial Director — Director of Account Settlement Control and Production Analysis Department, Commercial Directorate
In view of the high geopolitical tension, the Management Board of UTLC ERA resolved to set up a comprehensive risk management system.
-
A risk management team was formed (UTLC ERA Order No. 64 dated December 24, 2021)
-
UTLC ERA’s risk management policy was approved (BoD Minutes No. 52 dated May 11, 2022)
-
UTLC ERA’s Risk Management Regulations and Recommended Risk Management Practices were approved on May 11, 2022
-
Training was held for a wide audience of employees involved in the risk management processes
SWOT analysis
INTERNAL FACTORS
Strengths
-
Unique resource — international cooperation in the EAEU
-
Cost leadership in the market achieved by continuous optimization and building of a long-term partnership system
-
Adaptivity of the company’s established business processes to external challenges
-
Streamlined technology for en route container unit train management
-
One-stop customer service
-
Company’s operational and financial stability
Weaknesses
-
Business model limitations, including the company’s operation area
-
No access to end consignors
-
Lack of information on the cost of the integrated logistics service components outside the company’s remit
-
Overlapping structure of customers and service component providers (the same companies)
-
Slow corporate decision making due to the need to align the interests of three shareholders
-
No customer relations management IT system
EXTERNAL FACTORS
Opportunities
-
Growing demand for import and export traffic with China
-
Implementation of a coordinated development and integration program for the EAEU transport system
-
Development of international programs with the company’s participation aimed at testing new, primarily digital, technologies and services
-
Transformation of the container traffic market structure, new emerging routes/market players
-
Development of the terminal network in the EAEU
-
Potential demand due to rail transport stability
Threats
-
Reduced subsidies for rail transportation in China
-
EU sanction policy
-
Refusal of international insurance companies to insure cargoes transported via the company’s operation area
-
Stronger competition among international transport corridors and development of alternative border crossings
-
Changes in the shareholders’ tariff policy in regard to the company
-
Unfavorable market fluctuations for currency pairs
Key risk management tasks
The risk management model is built on the three-line defense concept:
Line 1
Risk owners — business units
Tasks
Bear the ultimate responsibility for management of risks related to the company’s day-to-day operations
Functions
-
Identify and analyze risks inherent in the day-to-day operations within their discipline
-
Share information/discuss risks with the management to integrate risks into the decision making process
-
Develop and implement measures and monitoring procedures to minimize the risks within their discipline
Line 2
Supervising units
Risk management unit
Tasks
Identify the emerging risks, practice a proactive approach, identify potential gaps in the control system
Functions
Risk management
-
Bears responsibility for methodological support and coordination of risk management processes.
-
Provides advisory support to the first line of defense in terms of risk identification and assessment, definition of an acceptable risk level, development of measures and monitoring procedures.
-
Prepares risk management reports with up-to-date and adequate risk information.
Other supervising units
-
Perform/assist the first line of defense in identification and analysis of cross-functional risks within their discipline.
-
Develop and implement measures and supervising procedures to minimize cross-functional risks within their discipline.
Line 3
Internal audit
Tasks
Provides for a fair and independent auditor opinion, assesses efficiency of the first and second line services
Functions
-
Makes an independent assessment of the risk management system.
-
Assists development and follow-up monitoring of the procedures and measures to improve the risk management system.
-
Coordinates with the risk management consulting service providers.
Risk management model
-
Approves Risk Management Policy
-
Reviews risk materials and prepares recommendations for the Board of Directors
-
Reviews results of independent risk management system assessment
-
Signs off corporate risk management regulations
-
Signs off register, risk map, acceptable risk value, and risk treatment plan
-
Signs off Risk Management Report
-
Approves risk management procedures and methodical recommendations
-
Approves risk management plan
-
Approves key risks, risk map, and acceptable risk value
-
Approves risk treatment plan
-
Examines identified risks for completeness and conformity to risk management methods
-
Rates risks by criticality level
-
Validates acceptable risk value indicators
-
Escalates risk information to be taken into account in decision making by management bodies
and Risk Analysis Director
-
Prepares draft updates of management regulations
-
Examines identified risks for completeness and conformity to risk management methods
-
Examines proposed risk treatment actions
-
Coordinates and monitors risk management processes and risk treatment actions
-
Provides guidance and advice to risk owners
-
Consolidates information - forms register, risk map, and risk treatment plan
-
Prepares periodic risk management reports
-
Identify, analyze and assess risks in the course of financial and business operations
-
Prepare proposals on acceptable risk value indicators
-
Develop and implement risk treatment measures; monitor implementation
-
Conduct in-process monitoring of acceptable risk value indicators, risk level, risk realization events
-
Escalate risk information to be taken into account in decision making by management bodies
Board of Directors
-
Approves Risk Management Policy
Audit Committee
-
Reviews risk materials and prepares recommendations for the Board of Directors
-
Reviews results of independent risk management system assessment
Management Board
-
Signs off corporate risk management regulations
-
Signs off register, risk map, acceptable risk value, and risk treatment plan
-
Signs off Risk Management Report
General Director
-
Approves risk management procedures and methodical recommendations
-
Approves risk management plan
-
Approves key risks, risk map, and acceptable risk value
-
Approves risk treatment plan
Risk Management Team
-
Examines identified risks for completeness and conformity to risk management methods
-
Rates risks by criticality level
-
Validates acceptable risk value indicators
-
Escalates risk information to be taken into account in decision making by management bodies
Business Development and Risk Analysis Director
-
Prepares draft updates of management regulations
-
Examines identified risks for completeness and conformity to risk management methods
-
Examines proposed risk treatment actions
-
Coordinates and monitors risk management processes and risk treatment actions
-
Provides guidance and advice to risk owners
-
Consolidates information - forms register, risk map, and risk treatment plan
-
Prepares periodic risk management reports
Risk owners
-
Identify, analyze and assess risks in the course of financial and business operations
-
Prepare proposals on acceptable risk value indicators
-
Develop and implement risk treatment measures; monitor implementation
-
Conduct in-process monitoring of acceptable risk value indicators, risk level, risk realization events
-
Escalate risk information to be taken into account in decision making by management bodies
Risk management process
Monitoring
Monitoring is a continuous process covering all risk management stages Monitoring includes review of risk treatment implementation status and analysis of changes to be taken into consideration in the course of risk management
Planning
Risk management planning includes definition of the purpose and application sphere of risk management, subject to the internal and external context, and development of implementation plan.
Risk identification and analysis
Risk identification and analysis include search, identification, description and classification of risks that may impact achievement of the Company’s goals, as well as cause and effect analysis.
Recording
Recording the results of risk management stages is intended to raise awareness of, and responsibility for, risk management.
Risk assessment
Risk assessment means determining the extent of risk impact on the Company’s goals.
Risk response
Risk response involves a choice of the most effective risk management measures to mitigate risk probability or damage.
Information exchange and communication
The purpose of information exchange and communication is to ensure the Company’s awareness about risks and response possibilities
Results for 2022
Key risks:
-
1.
Risk of declining political stability in the countries where the company/its partners operate and in the countries along the route
-
2.
Risk of reduction/stagnation of traffic volumes in the corridor via Kazakhstan
-
3.
Risk of amendments to the railway transit service terms in the UTLC ERA member countries
-
4.
Risk of closure/partial operating limitations of the checkpoints on the EU border
-
5.
Risk of creating a negative image of the company
-
6.
Risk of significant disruptions/railway infrastructure limitations in the 1,520 mm track gauge areas
-
7.
Risk of increasingly unbalanced container traffic flows
-
8.
Risk of impossibility to make payments
-
9.
Risk of banks failing to fulfill their cash management obligations
-
10.
Risk of data corruption/inaccessibility or loss, IT unavailability caused by cyber security incidents
-
11.
Currency risk
-
12.
Risk of non-applicability of special tariff terms
Out of 52 identified risks, 7 were realized,
including 3 key risks:
-
1.
Risk of declining political stability in the countries where the company / its partners operate and in the countries along the route (key risk)
-
2.
Risk of significant disruptions / railway infrastructure limitations in the 1,520 mm track gauge areas (key risk)
-
3.
Risk of failure to provide the required rail car fleet
-
4.
Risk of increasing platform procurement costs
-
5.
Accounting misstatement risk
-
6.
Rail car seizure risk
-
7.
Currency risk (key risk).
Next section
Appendices
6